Sunday, June 6, 2010

The Future...

        George Griffin's fate is pretty much out of the people's hands now.  The big guys have taken over.
        The American Association of School Administrators has entered the fray.  I'm guessing that there is some unhappiness about these developments out there on Grant Avenue.   It just might be a good time to honk louder and longer as we drive by.  Where is that guy with the locomotive horn under his hood when we need him?

        So, it looks like the District is going to have to spend some of their damn-scarce money to defend their stupidity.  The matter of the personal liability of the Board members will be interesting to watch, too.  Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Public Meeting laws are very serious matters.

        As anybody who has paid attention knows, this thing between the School Board and its constituents  has gone way beyond their personal grudges and dismissal of George.

Every time I think things will settle down, I'm wrong.  Hope usually springs eternal with me, but my springs are getting a little spongy these days.
        This week they swore in the new Board member at their meeting on Tuesday, and we are thrilled to have her join the Board.  Unfortunately, her swearing-in was not on the Agenda for the meeting.  Of course, the legal notice of the meeting was on a bulletin board in a locked Admin building over a three-day weekend, so nobody could see it anyway.

Is the swearing-in a big deal?  Probably not, and it definitely would not be if this were an isolated incident.  We all know it's not.

        And I've been thinking about what our expectations of the W.J.U.S.D. Board might be as we move on from here.  We will definitely move on, but it remains to be seen whether we will be moving
forward or not.
        At some level, it's a bit embarrassing to have to even think about such a list.  It's 2010, for goodness' sake.

        Oh well.  So, here goes...

  • We expect meetings to have the legally-mandated public notice 72-hours in advance and in a public location.  Inside the closed and locked Admin building is outrageous.  And let's be a little more classy than a window of the office, huh?  A nice little glass-faced bulletin/notice board is not that expensive.
  • We want the School Board meetings televised, starting as soon as possible.  That means this calendar year.  It's not that expensive to do, Wave Cable can help acquire the equipment needed- or the Board can talk to the City Council about using the Council Chambers.  Citizens, Teachers, and Staff should not have to choose between attending a Board meeting and being with their families. 
  • We expect all Agenda items to be discussed, and questions from the public answered, including items on the Consent Calendar.  This idea that the Consent Calendar is some sacred refuge, and can be routinely used to avoid questions and evade inquiring minds is a joke.
  • Since the Agenda can be modified once the meeting has started, citizens must be allowed to speak and ask questions about items on the Agenda, even if the discussion has already started.  And they must be advised, as the law dictates, that giving their name and address is voluntary.
  • We expect Board members to be adults.  Disagreeing, arguing, questioning somebody's statements- these are all acceptable and expected roles for Board members, but the rolling of eyes, the audible sighing and laughing, and the shouting down of other Board members and staff- yes, pretty much acting like perfect jackasses- is unacceptable.
Government is a trust, and the officers of the government are trustees; and both the trust and the trustees are created for the benefit of the people.   -Henry Clay

The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object.   -Thomas Jefferson

    Thursday, May 13, 2010

    What a difference two days makes.....

    In a bit of cutting-edge social commentary, I was asked in an anonymous comment about my last entry, purportedly by a Board member relative, whether or not I talk to my family.

    Clearly a descendant of Edward R. Murrow.

    Of course I talk to my family- sometimes more than once a day.

    I do not, however, talk to them about confidential City Council matters.  They don't hear from me about those matters and they don't get to see any e-mails about them.  Nada.  Zip.  Zilch.

    You see, I was elected to the City Council, and my family was not.  They were not put on the City Council to govern and set policy, to occasionally deal with confidential issues involving personnel, potential or actual litigation, or real estate matters.  I was.

    There is no legal exception that allows family to know about such things.  It's on a need-to-know basis, and they don't need to know.

    This is not a goddamn game, and the School Board is NOT supposed to be a frickin' Circus.

    On last Tuesday's City Council Consent Calendar were a couple of items.  One example:
    Item B "Police Lieutenant Job Classification and Salary Range (pp 6-12)".

    Simple, right?  Easy to understand, to know what it covers, and even what questions one might want to ask.

    On the Consent Calendar for last Thursday night's School Board meeting: 
    6. Approve Personnel as Listed.

    Sounds like teaching or job assignments, huh?

    It was.  A change of Principals at two of the schools.

    Wow.  Doesn't that seem like something that should have more explanation on an Agenda or Consent Calendar?  Yes.

    Why does it matter?  It matters because people want to know what's going on.  Most Boards and Councils do not duplicate the complete Agenda Packets when they are sending them out ahead of time.  It's reasonable to do it that way, as it saves copying costs.  But it also begs for complete descriptions of the Items listed, because there are no in-depth materials attached.

    How would somebody know whether they want to go speak on Principal assignments with that description and no back-up materials?  They would not.

    Both bodies need to modify their requirements on people speaking.  Giving one's name and address as a speaker in front of either group is voluntary, by law, and speakers 1) should 
    not be asked to identify themselves, or 2) if asked to do so, must be advised that compliance is voluntary.

    Also at Thursday's meeting, Jiley got up to ask questions about an agenda item, and was told by the President that they were not there to answer questions from the public, but just for School Board discussion.

    Wow II.  Censorship.  What's next, burning books?  I think Rodney is a teacher, but it can't be in Civics.

    Socrates.  Euripides.  Luther.  Goosebumps.  To Kill a Mockingbird.  Huckleberry Finn.

    Unbelievable.  It's 2010, but the WJUSD is stuck in an ethical Ice Age.

    PS- A very nice FFA dinner the other night, my last daughter going out into the world.  Those of you who did not applaud for George Griffin when he was honored a couple of times should hand the teaching of class to your children off to somebody better equipped to handle the the lessons.